I recently needed to plot some polar data for a project at work, and the data happened to be 3-dimensional. In addition to the standard rotation and radius, it had a third dimension that corresponded to a strength metric. Unfortunately, *Mathematica* (my tool of choice for data manipulation and plotting) lacks native support for 3D plotting in the polar coordinate system. It does, however, have excellent support for list/matrix manipulation, so I was able to put together this one-liner to produce a 3D plot from a `N x 3`

matrix of `θ, r, h`

coordinates:

```
ListPolarPlot3D[data_, opts___] := Module[{polarConvert}, polarConvert[coords_] := {coords[[2]]*Cos[coords[[1]] Degree], coords[[2]]*Sin[coords[[1]] Degree], coords[[3]]}; ListPlot3D[Map[polarConvert, data], Evaluate[opts]]]
```

After pasting that into your *Mathematica* notebook, you can easily generate 3D plots of polar coordinate data by calling `ListPolarPlot3D`

. For example:

```
ListPolarPlot3D[Table[{n, n/2, Sin[n*4 Degree]}, {n, 0, 1080}], ColorFunction -> "RedBlueTones"]
```

Gives you this:

# Breakdown

Here’s what each part of the snippet does:

```
ListPolarPlot3D[data_, opts___] := Define a function called `ListPolarPlot3D` that takes a variable number of arguments. Store the first argument in the `data` variable, and all the others in the `opts` variable. The triple-underscore means "zero or more arguments".
Module[{polarConvert}, Create a local scope for the `polarConvert` function so that it doesn't interfere with anything in the global scope that might be called `polarConvert`.
polarConvert[coords_] := {coords[[2]]*Cos[coords[[1]] Degree], coords[[2]]*Sin[coords[[1]] Degree], coords[[3]]}; Use the identities `x = r × cos(θ)` and `y = r × sin(θ)` to convert the polar coordinates to Cartesian, and leave the `y` coordinate alone
ListPlot3D[Map[polarConvert, data], Evaluate[opts]]] This does three things. `Map[polarConvert, data]` applies the polar coordinate conversion function to each coordinate in the data, then returns the converted dataset. `Evaluate[opts]` allows us to pass in a List of options to `ListPlot3D` bypassing the `HoldAll` attribute that `ListPlot3D` has by default. `ListPlot3D` takes the converted cartesian data and evaluated options and generates a 3D plot from them. The final closing bracket closes the `Module` and returns the `ListPlot3D`.
```

# Modifications

It’s pretty easy to tweak the snippet to suit your needs. Here are a couple of examples:

## Use radians instead of degrees

```
ListPolarPlot3D[data_, opts___] := Module[{polarConvert}, polarConvert[coords_] := {coords[[2]]*Cos[coords[[1]]], coords[[2]]*Sin[coords[[1]]], coords[[3]]}; ListPlot3D[Map[polarConvert, data], Evaluate[opts]]]
```

## Render the data as points rather than a surface

```
ListPolarPointPlot3D[data_, opts___] := Module[{polarConvert}, polarConvert[coords_] := {coords[[2]]*Cos[coords[[1]] Degree], coords[[2]]*Sin[coords[[1]] Degree], coords[[3]]}; ListPointPlot3D[Map[polarConvert, data], Evaluate[opts]]]
```

# Limitations

There are a few things to note when using this technique. First, *Mathematica* wants to automatically scale the axes by default. This can result in improperly displayed graphs if the scale for the `x`

and `y`

axes is different. I recommend setting your `xy`

scale explicitly (i.e. `PlotRange -> {{-10, 10}, {-10, 10}, Automatic})`

).

Second, you’re going to have Cartesian axes displayed. Short of really digging into *Mathematica*’s `Graphics3D`

implementation, there’s really no good way around this as the way that the whole technique works is by mapping the polar data into the Cartesian plane.